Legal Opinion

Urnest v. Forged Tooth Gear Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 14, 1968No. Gen. 52,250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

This is a so-called shareholders derivative suit brought by the plaintiff, Charles Urnest, as a minority shareholder of The Forged Tooth Gear Company, one of the defendants. The remaining defendants are The Cornell Forge Company, which is the principal shareholder of The Forged Tooth Gear Company, and three individuals, A. Nelson Cornell, Alverin M. Cornell and Arthur M. Cornell, who are the principal shareholders of The Cornell Company, as well as officers and directors of that company and the Forged Tooth Gear Company.

The alignment of the parties and the nature of the controversy can best…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Dregne v. Five Cent Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Tilley v. ShippeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Wise Realty Co. v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Carrillo v. O'HaraIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. TaubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Roemer v. Zurich Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Johnson v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Coleman v. TaubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API