West Coast Builders, Inc. v. Pacific States Auxiliary Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff began this action'to enjoin the foreclosure of a certain trust deed securing a note executed by a remote predecessor in title. A demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. From the judgment of dismissal entered thereafter, this appeal is prosecuted.
The amended complaint alleges that one Alma C. Tad-lock executed a promissory note to the Pacific States Savings and Loan Company, in the sum of $9,650; that the sum of $9,650 was not paid or delivered to the said Alma C. Tadlock at the time of the execution of the note, but that there was deducted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Esposti v. Rivers Brothers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Rice v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Van Noy v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Duke v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Finley v. WyattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barnes v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966