Patterson v. Hansel
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 92 — EJECTMENT APPEAL PROM TAYLOR CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Act of 1785, M. ó; B., 433 ; Act of 1795, lb., 437. Act of 1796, lb., 453; Act of 1831, lb., 453. 1 Marshall, 310 ; Morgan vs. Beall. 5 J. J. M., 24 ; Edwards vs. Hanna. 4 Littell, 272 ; Dunlap's heirs vs. Mcllvoy. 7 B. Mon., 162; Pierce's heirs vs. Patton. 2 Bush, 453 ; Terrill vs. Rankin. 3 B. Mon., 173; Dennis vs. Warden. 2 Bibb, 148-9; Robertson vs. Morgan. CITED— M. B.’s Digest, 437, 438, 439, 453.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PETERS
delivered the opinion of the court:
As to the exceptions to the depositions of Mrs. Henry and others, the record shows that on the 14th March, 1868, exceptions were filed to them, but it does not show that they were acted on by the court, and this court must presume that the exceptions were waived, as has been repeatedly ruled.
It should be observed, that it is stated in the bill of exceptions, that on the trial, the plaintiffs read to the jury the depositions of Mary Henry, taken August 31st, 1836; J. Barker, taken June 3d, 1866; W. Butler, October 17th, 1835, “to which depositions…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Applegate v. GracyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
- Griffith v. DickenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1841
3Cited by13 opinions
- May v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Hancock v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Levy v. Doerhoefer'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Skidmore v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Johnston v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.