Griffith v. Dicken

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This case was formerly before the Court, and the opinion reported in 4th Dana, p. 561, is referred to for a general statement of the matters in controversy,

Several demises having been stricken from the declaration, the plaintiff's claim now stands upon the separate demises of Walter Baker, the patentee of two-thirds of 1500 acres, including the land in contest, and Remus Griffith claiming 500 acres of the 1500 by deed from the heirs of Charles Travis, to whom John Dicken, the copatentee of one third of the 1500 acres, had conveyed 500 acres…