Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Pierce v. Brice

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to punish for contempt.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

The respondent Brice was, in the year 1899, a member of the council of the city of New York. On the twenty-second of July of that year a writ of peremptory mandamus was duly issued out of this court directed to the said council and the board of aldermen, together constituting “ the municipal assembly of the city of New York,” commanding said council and board of aldermen to forthwith assemble and authorize the comptroller of the city of New York to issue corporate stock of said city for the purpose of paying to the relator certain sums of money due him under a contract between himself and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The People v. . SturtevantNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. United Press v. . New York Press Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. People Ex Rel. Platt v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Jewelers' Mercantile Agency v. RothschildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. People ex rel. Pierce v. GuggenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fine v. Clinton Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API