Legal Opinion

State v. Lynch

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 27, 2007No. 4317PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, J.:

In this criminal case, we affirm the trial court’s holding that an inmate was not entitled to be advised of his Miranda 1 rights when he spoke to a television reporter.

FACTS

Prisoners rioted at the Lee Correctional Institution located in Bishopville, South Carolina. Correctional Officers Marcus Cotton (Cotton) and Kenneth Dozier (Dozier) were working in the Chesterfield Housing Unit at the time of the riot. Prior to the incident, Cotton was providing meals to inmates located in the south side of the Chesterfield Unit, while Dozier provided meals to inmates located in the north…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. PittmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MedleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  3. State v. HoyleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API