State v. Hoyle

This appeal arises out of Appellant Mark Allen Hoyle’s magistrate’s court conviction for driving under the influence (DUI). The circuit court found the magistrate erred by failing to suppress the incident site video recording due to incomplete *624Miranda1 warnings; consequently, the circuit court remanded the case to the magistrate’s court for a new trial. On appeal, the State argues the circuit court erred in ordering the suppression of the video recording because the arresting officer gave Hoyle sufficient Miranda warnings in compliance with section 56-5-2953 of the South Carolina Code…