Legal Opinion

Montague v. Godfrey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 8, 2008No. A07A2392PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

Shortly before expiration of the statute of limitation, Taylor Montague brought suit against Vanilda Camilo and her employer, Gary Godfrey, individually and d/b/a Baker Imported Auto Parts (“Baker Imported”), seeking damages arising out of an automobile collision. The trial court granted Camilo’s motion to dismiss on the ground that Montague had failed to diligently serve her after the running of the limitation period, and denied Montague’s motion to serve her by publication. The trial court then granted Baker Imported’s motion for summary judgment. Montague now appeals these…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hedquist v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Melton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Parker v. SilvianoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Hight v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Duffy v. LylesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James Giles v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Long v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Milton v. GoinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Akuoko v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Wellman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API