Legal Opinion
In Re Hawkins
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 20, 2006No. 06-00057PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION REGARDING DEBTORS RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
S.MARTIN TEEL, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.
On March 21, 2006, the court entered an order denying the debtor’s request for a temporary exemption from the pre-petition date credit counseling requirement set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 109(h) (D.E. No. 12). Based on the debtor’s apparent failure to fulfill the requirement set forth in § 109(h), the court ordered the debtor to show cause why her case ought not be dismissed by March 28, 2006. The debtor has filed a belated response to that order in which she asserts that certain “regular” credit…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re ParkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
- In Re MitranoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- In Re MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- In Re ElmendorfUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re ThompsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.