Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1985No. Cr. 1085PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Larry Ford (Ford) appeals from a judgment of conviction for gross sexual imposition and from an order denying his motion for new trial. We affirm.

Ford was charged with having engaged in a sexual act with his twelve-year-old daughter, Audrey, in violation of Section 12.1-20-03(l)(d), N.D.C.C. The alleged act occurred during December 1983, and the charge was brought after Audrey’s disclosure of the incident to a nurse who was conducting a sexual awareness presentation to students at Audrey’s elementary school on April 12,1984. Ford was convicted of the offense by jury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Ralph Melvin Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. Harold Lee Batsell v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. TiborNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Greywind v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. HerschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. DavenportNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GarciaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ramsey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API