Fischnaller v. Sumner
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
This action was instituted by the plaintiffs, holders of an option to lease certain real property in East Wenatchee, Douglas county, Washington, to recover damages from the defendants for tortious interference with the performance of the lease agreement contained in the option. It was the contention of the plaintiffs that they exercised their option but that the defendants induced the optionor to< fail and refuse to give a lease.
At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, the defendants Sumner were dismissed as parties, and to the court’s ruling in this regard, no error is assigned. After all the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Swiger v. HaymanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Finch v. SpragueWashington Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- McAlpine v. AAMCO Automatic Transmissions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Arabesque Studios, Inc. v. Academy of Fine Arts International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Olson v. ScholesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Lowe v. BeatySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Volga-Dnepr UK Ltd v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020