Legal Opinion

People v. Watson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1983No. Crim. 12186PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

Defendant Patricia Kay Watson was charged by information with possession for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) and sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379) of amphetamines. Claiming a lack of compliance with Penal Code section 869, defendant filed written objection at arraignment in the superior court to the reporter’s transcript of the preliminary hearing. The court ordered that transcript sticken and dismissed the information pursuant to Penal Code section 995. The People appeal. (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. (a)(1). All further statutory references are to sections of the Penal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Alvarado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. MacKeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Currie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API