Legal Opinion
United States v. Claxton
U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review
Decided January 31, 1990No. CGCM 0006; Docket No. 902PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT’S DECISION OF 30 SEPTEMBER 1989
BAUM, Chief Judge:
On October 25, 1989, in accordance with Rule 19 of the Courts of Military Review Rules of Practice and Procedure, this Court granted the Government’s motion for reconsideration of our decision of September 30, 1989 1. Since the prejudicial errors found by this Court which formed the basis for our decision to set aside the punishment and order a sentence rehearing were developed independently as part of our Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866 review and had not been assigned, briefed or argued by counsel, it was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. SuzukiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. HornerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. DukesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. ClaxtonU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. PuckettU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.