Ehlers v. Wannack Bros.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new. trial. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMeFAELAND, J.
This action was brought to recover from the defendants the reasonable value of plaintiffs alleged services rendered as an architect in drawing and preparing certain plans and specifications for buildings proposed to be erected by the defendants. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty-one dollars and forty-five cents; and from the judgment and an order denying a new trial the defendants appeal.
The evidence as to the value having been entirely that of expert witnesses, who differed in their estimates of the value, the defendants asked one of the witnesses how…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McLean v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re the Estate of DorlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lamoreaux v. AnderschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Rosander v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- John H. Spohn Co. v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Meyer v. BuckleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.