Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Ferraro

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 3, 1978No. C-3-78-51PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P., for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (Fidelity) seeks a declaratory judgment that its policy with its insured, Michael J. Ferraro, does not provide coverage for the injuries he has sustained. Mr. Ferraro asserts the arbitration clause contained in the policy as a bar to judicial review of Fidelity’s obligations under the uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. Lumbermens Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Sardo v. McGrath Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. Raymond Richardson, Jr. v. Hugh F. Rivers, D. C. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  5. Otis Sims v. Mercy Hospital of MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New Castle County v. U.S. Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1989
  2. Cox v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Glover v. SpencerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API