Marshall v. Medical Associates of Rhode Island, Inc.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On April 16, 1996, counsel for the parties came before us to show cause why this appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, Medical Associates of Rhode Island, Inc., and Diane DeFusco, after the granting of a directed-verdict motion, now known as a motion for judgment as a matter of law, should not be determined summarily. Having listened to their arguments and reviewed their submissions, we perceive no cause and shall therefore go directly to the nub of this matter without any extended factual exegesis.
This case requires us to construe G.L.1956 § 9-19-41, which provides in…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- De Bartolo v. Di BattistaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
- Owens v. Payless Cashways, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Soares v. VestalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
4Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Gallucci v. HumbrydSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- State v. BotelhoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Sheeley v. Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Gianquitti v. Atwood Medical Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.