Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Peterson)

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1992No. D017419PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

The People, by petition for a writ of mandate 1 , seek to vacate a sentencing order requiring Bryan Scott Peterson to serve 200 days in the custody of a private, noncontract work furlough facility. The People contend under Penal Code 2 section 1208, only the work furlough administrator has the discretion to place a convicted person in a work furlough facility and any private facility must be under contract to serve as a place of confinement for county prisoners. Peterson argues his placement in work furlough is proper as a reasonable condition of probation under section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Daly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. People v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. In Re RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. P. v. Jessen CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Semiconductor Global Solutions v. Capital Asset Exchange and Trading, LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API