People v. Superior Court (Peterson)
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
The People, by petition for a writ of mandate 1 , seek to vacate a sentencing order requiring Bryan Scott Peterson to serve 200 days in the custody of a private, noncontract work furlough facility. The People contend under Penal Code 2 section 1208, only the work furlough administrator has the discretion to place a convicted person in a work furlough facility and any private facility must be under contract to serve as a place of confinement for county prisoners. Peterson argues his placement in work furlough is proper as a reasonable condition of probation under section…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Daly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- In Re RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- P. v. Jessen CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Semiconductor Global Solutions v. Capital Asset Exchange and Trading, LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026