Legal Opinion
Sloman v. Tadlock
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1994No. 92-55597PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
21 F.3d 1462
Edward SLOMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Philip TADLOCK; David Allen; Roger Douglas; Pat Sardella,
aka Mr. Whitaker; Matthew Obertone; Neil Rein;
Simi Valley Police Department, Defendants,
and
City of Simi Valley; Herman Hale, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 92-55597, 92-55692 and 92-55851.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1993.
Decided April 14, 1994.
Edward M. Fox, Esq., Klass, Helman & Ross, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee, and cross appellant.
Malcolm Tator, Kosmos, Cho & Brown, Ventura CA, foe defendant and cross appellee.
Bert Deixler, Timothy…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Menotti v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Torres v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- A. D. v. State of Calif. Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Tatro v. KervinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.