Legal Opinion

United States v. Raymond D. Cheely, Jr. Douglas P. Gustafson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1994No. 92-30257, 92-30504PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge FLETCHER; Concurrence and Dissent by Judge ALARCON.

ORDER

Although no petition for rehearing was filed, and no request for en banc rehearing was made by the parties, a member of the court requested en banc rehearing of this appeal. The request was put to a vote of all active non-reeused judges. The request did not secure the required majority vote of the active non-recused members of the court.

The panel, of its own motion, called for supplemental briefs on the possible effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Davis v. United States, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lykos v. FineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Billy Russell Clark v. Tim MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. United States v. Robert ManningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Delbert Paulino v. R.A. Castro, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API