Legal Opinion
State v. Peardot
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 25, 1984No. 83-296-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
Defendant Bruce Peardot appeals from a conviction of delivering a controlled substance, party to a crime, secs. 161.41(1) (a) and 939.05, Stats., and an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and other errors. We affirm.
The evidence showed that a citizen informant used marked currency to purchase LSD from James Linder, who had obtained the LSD from defendant and who passed the marked bills on to him. The bills were found in defendant’s wallet when he was arrested without a warrant later that night at his house. Defendant’s trial counsel did not move…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- State v. FeltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BohlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AmosCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- People v. BlasiusMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MilashoskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- State v. Andy J. ParisiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.