Legal Opinion

Langlois v. Pomerleau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 18, 1999No. 97-490PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendants, Alan and Michelle Pomerleau, appeal a decision of the Superior Court {Coffey, J.), denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict from a jury verdict that found them liable for negligently supervising their three-year-old son. The plaintiff, John Langlois, cross-appeals, arguing that the trial court improperly granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s negligence claim, and improperly granted the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict on the plaintiff’s negligent entrustment claim. We reverse the denial of the defendants’ motion for a judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Broderick v. WattsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. LeBlanc v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. Bohan v. RitzoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. Taylor-Boren v. IsaacSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dupont v. Aavid Thermal Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. Grossman v. MurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. Canty v. HopkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  4. Quinn Bros. v. WhitehouseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. Goffin v. TofteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API