Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sentinel Insurance Co.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
WATANABE, J.
I respectfully dissent as to the partial majority opinion in Part H.B.2., upholding the validity of Liberty Mutual’s excess “other insurance” clause.
As is typical of insurance policies nationwide, the PEMCO, H/S, and Liberty Mutual policies in this case all included provisions *355that limited or eliminated each respective insurer's liability for UM or UIM payment in the event that “other insurance” was available to cover an insured’s loss. Such “other insured” clauses have spawned a tremendous amount of litigation across the country and have been the focus of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.