Legal Opinion

United States v. O'Driscoll

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 2002No. 1:94-mdl-00999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MUIR, District Judge.

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

On August 21, 2002, a federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment charging Michael J. O’Driscoll with murder in the first degree in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111. On September 16, 2002, the government filed a supplemental notice of intent to seek the death- penalty. Jury drawing was scheduled to commence in this case on October 8,-2002. On October 7, 2002, O’Driscoll filed a document entitled “Motion, In Light of the Government’s Failure to Comply with 18 U.S.C. § 3432, to Dismiss the Aggravating Factors Set Forth…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. Joseph C. Amsler and John W. Irwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API