Legal Opinion
Rutledge v. Electric Hose and Rubber Company
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 22, 1971No. 69-825PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER F.R.C.P. 41(b).
DAVID W. WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Certain of the defendants in this case are manufacturers of hydraulic hose. 1 Their product is used in a variety of equipment including automotive hydraulic systems, aircraft systems, earthmoving and agricultural equipment. Hydraulic hose is the term applied to reinforced flexible hose whose primary function is to carry fluids under relatively high pressure. It is generally made to comply with specifications or standards fixed by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Hydraulic hose is actually a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Amey, Inc., and John C. Amis, Jr. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., Amey, Inc., and John C. Amis, Jr. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- M. D. Rutledge v. Boston Woven Hose and Rubber Company, a Division of American Biltrite, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.