Legal Opinion

People v. Rogelio

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1992PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant claims that a new trial must be ordered because the prosecutor failed to produce certain Rosario material consisting of a writeup sheet containing statements of a prosecution witness, a police officer. After the trial court’s instructions to the jury were completed, defense counsel stated, “with some reluctance”, to the court for the first time that the prosecutor failed to provide him with the writeup sheet. Defense counsel asked for no relief but merely noted that he was informing the court “for…

2Cited by85 opinions

  1. People v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. EnnisNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. People v. FeerickNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. People v. DicksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. AugustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API