Legal Opinion

Electric Supply Co. v. City of Muskogee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1935No. 24858PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in this cause sues the city of Muskogee, a municipal corporation, and E. H. Shoults, alleging that a contract had been entered into by the municipal corporation and E H. Shoults whereby the said E. II. Shoults had been awarded the contract in the furnishing of •material and doing certain parts of said work, to wit, the installation of outlets for ‘phone, power and light, including $1,500 for the purchase and changing of lighting fixtures, also extending the underground service out of the building, all for the sum of $4,740.

The plaintiff alleges that a certain contract was made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Bushnell v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. United Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Reinhart Donovan v. Bd. of Com'rs of Choctaw CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Tulsa Boiler & Mfg. Co. v. ShafferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Drummond v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Boren v. Thompson & AssociatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Gibbs v. Trinity Universal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Traders General Ins. Co. v. Sand Springs HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Robbins v. City of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API