Legal Opinion

Andraka v. Town of Pompey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.

The defendants in these actions by appropriate motion sought a dismissal of the complaints upon the ground that the Municipal Court of Syracuse does not have jurisdiction of the subject of the actions. The several plaintiffs, residents of the city of Syracuse, were occupants of an automobile owned by the plaintiff, Edward Andraka, Sr., and operated at the time by his wife the plaintiff, Frances Andraka, on a public highway in the town of Pompey. It is alleged that the highway was negligently maintained causing the automobile to overturn with resulting injuries and damages to the plaintiffs.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Fleischmann v. . GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Maisch v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Eldred v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beneke v. Town of Santa ClaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Roslyn Union Free School District v. BarkanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Roslyn Union Free School District v. BarkanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Weingarten v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API