Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Hope
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 25, 1947No. 5280; No. 5281PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
The Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarded to the appellee, Hope, priority of the invention defined in five counts in Interference Xo. 80,584, Patent Appeal Xo. 5280, and priority of the invention defined in two counts in Interference Xo. 81,145, Patent Appeal Xo. 5281. Appellants, hereinafter referred to as Sherman, have here appealed from the board’s decisions.
The board considered the issues in each of the interferences separately and wrote two opinions, requiring two appeals, which were argued together in this court. We will consider the issues in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hess v. DreyfussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mortsell v. LaurilaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Gilbert R. Wolter, Alfred F. Ernstberger and Frederick J. Ritter v. Michael E. Belicka, Robert J. Kenny and Rodney LonginCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- United States v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1999
- Gilbert R. Wolter, Alfred F. Ernstberger and Frederick J. Ritter v. Michael E. Belicka, Robert J. Kenny and Rodney LonginCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Mortsell v. LaurilaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962