Legal Opinion

Morillo v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin Schoenfeld, J.

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs in this action are unleased occupants of New York City-owned in rem apartment buildings who claim that the City may not bring eviction proceedings against such occupants without first providing them with certain incidents of due process. The defendants are the City of New York (City) and the City’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD).

Essentially, plaintiffs claim that pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution the unleased occupants may not have eviction proceedings brought…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Morillo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API