Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1982No. 17916PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant raises but one point in her appeal of a burglary conviction by jury trial. She contends that in putting her foot in a shoe at the request of the prosecution during her trial, she was denied her right under Article I, Sec. 12 of the Constitution of Utah that “[t]he accused shall not be compelled to give evidence against himself.”

The record clearly shows that after a recess during which the court and counsel discussed the matter out of the presence of the jury, neither the defendant nor counsel made any objection to such procedure. Defendant complied with the request with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CoboUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. SchadUtah Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. ArchambeauCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  3. State v. RobisonUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. LesleyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API