Legal Opinion

Hamby v. Hamby

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 24, 1963No. 39876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The motion for summary judgment was based on the pleadings and the evidence adduced on the prior trials, the judgments of this court and the affidavit of counsel for the defendant that the evidence on another trial would be no different from that adduced on the first two trials. On the hearing of the motion for summary judgment no showing was made that any additional or different evidence would be adduced on a third trial and the motion was not, according to the record, controverted in any manner.

In support of his position, that the trial court erred in granting the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scales v. PeevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Studstill v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Hamby v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldsmith v. American Food Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Myers v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Dennard v. StylesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API