Legal Opinion
Exeter Realty Corp. v. Town of Bedford
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 26, 1969PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
The plaintiff (Exeter) by its bill seeks declaratory relief against the town, the town building in*400spector, and the collector of taxes. The case, before us on a statement of agreed facts, was reserved and reported without decision at the request of all parties who appeared and answered.
Exeter, as indirect successor in title to Lido Construction Co. Inc. (Lido), owns lots numbered 17 through 28 in a subdivision known as Whispering Pines, Section V. When Lido in 1963 sought approval of Section V as a subdivision, the town planning board required that all lots in the subdivision be connected with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Inhabitants of Leominster v. ConantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Cheney v. City of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Seiler v. Board of Sewer CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- O'Malley v. Public Improvement Commission of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- O'MALLEY v. Commissioner of Public Works of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
3Cited by8 opinions
- Town of Winthrop v. Winthrop Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- State Line Snacks Corp. v. Town of WilbrahamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Ninety Six, LLC v. Wareham Fire Dist.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- Riccio v. DandreoMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995
- Abbott v. WrightMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.