Dahl v. Dahl
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFFORD SCHNELLER, District Judge.
The above action is one for divorce, The grounds for divorce as stated in plaintiff’s complaint was extreme cruelty.
The defendant by his amended answer admits acts on his part which caused mental cruelty to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff was permitted to prove her grounds for divorce as by default. The matter of the property accumulated by the parties during their marriage and its equitable division was litigated and is here for trial de novo upon the defendant’s appeal.
The facts and circumstances involved herein are substantially as follows: Plaintiff was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Agrest v. AgrestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- Buchanan v. BuchananNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Haugeberg v. HaugebergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Hegge v. HeggeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Piper v. PiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Nicholson v. NicholsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.