Legal Opinion
People v. Greenberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 15, 1980No. Crim. 10936PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARDNER, P. J.
Defendant was convicted of oral copulation in violation of Penal Code section 288a. The jury found it to be true that the crime was committed on a minor under 14 years of age and that the victim was more than 10 years younger than the person who committed the act upon her. This brought into play Penal Code section 288a, subdivision (c) which carries a greater punishment than the same offense without proof of the 10-year age differential. Defendant’s guilt rested on an aiding and abetting theory. Subsequently defendant was found to be a mentally disordered sex offender and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. HaywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. DroletCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Matter of Application of KantrowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Nopring Paulino Penuliar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Nopring Paulino Penuliar v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ganey v. DoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Bias v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.