Legal Opinion

Arkema Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 5, 2013No. 2012-1308PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”) and plaintiffs Arkema Inc. and Arkema France (“Arkema”) compete in the manufacture and sale of automotive refrigerants. Honeywell owns United States Patent No. 8,033,120 (“the '120 patent”) and United States Patent No. 8,065,-882 (“the '882 patent”). Arkema sought a declaratory judgment that by entering into contracts to supply HFO-1234yf (“1234yf”), a next-generation automotive refrigerant, to automobile manufacturers for use in automobile air conditioning systems, it would not incur liability as an indirect infringer…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Danisco U.S. Inc. v. Novozymes A/SCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Organic Seed Growers and Trade v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Trans Video Electronics, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  5. Allied Mineral Products, Inc. v. Osmi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API