Legal Opinion
Coles v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided October 15, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-1023-BPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE
POLOZOLA, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment and the defendants’ motion to strike. For reasons which follow, the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment is granted in part, and denied in part. The defendants’ motion to strike is denied as moot.
I. Facts and Procedural History
Brooks-Harbour and Associates (Brooks) contracted with the American Consulting Engineers Council Insurance Trust Fund (ACEC) to provide health insurance for Brooks’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tingle v. Pacific Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Cramer v. Association Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Sam C. Gonzales v. The Prudential Insurance Co. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clancy v. Employers Health InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1999
- Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Arana v. Ochsner Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Hicks v. CNA InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1998
- Sutherland v. United States Life Ins.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2003