Legal Opinion
United States v. Central Vermont Ry., Inc.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided May 11, 1936No. 961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, District Judge.
Findings of Facts.
The plaintiff seeks to recover extra compensation for overtime of its inspectors and employees in the Immigration *865Service, as provided by sections 109a and 109b, tit. 8 U.S.C. (8 U.S.C.A. §§ 109a, 109b). The overtime services were performed on the defendant’s passenger trains —principally in Canada — while en route from Montreal to St. Albans; Vt. St Al-bans is a designated port of entry for immigrants. The inspectors and employees go from there to Montreal; there they board the defendant’s passenger trains coming from Canada into the United States via…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howe v. United States ex rel. SavitskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Mellon v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1926
- Port Huron & Sarnia Ferry Co. v. LawsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lloyd G. Bishop v. The United States, and Bahamas Airways, Ltd., Third-Party Charles R. Challandes v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Laurens L. Delano v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Laurens L. Delano v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968