Legal Opinion

Ach v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. of Nebraska

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1974No. 39242PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClinton, J.

This is an action on a homeowner’s insurance policy to recover for the loss of a diamond ring by theft. Pursuant to stipulation the cause was tried to the court without a jury. The court found the ring had been lost by theft, but that the plaintiffs had not given timely notice of loss to the defendant insurance company as required by the terms of the policy and denied recovery. We affirm.

It is uncertain as to which of two policies was in effect at the time of the loss, but the slightly differing policy provisions pertaining to the giving of notice to the insurer are not determinative on this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. George v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Keene Cooperative Grain & Supply Co. v. Farmers Union Industries Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Clark v. State Farmers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coppi v. West American InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wolff v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Herman Bros., Inc. v. Great West Cas. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. First Security Bank & Trust v. New Hampshire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Zukaitis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API