Legal Opinion
First Security Bank & Trust v. New Hampshire Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1989No. 89-176PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
The plaintiff, First Security Bank & Trust, commenced this action to recover losses it alleged it sustained as the result of dishonest and fraudulent acts of James Gillette, an employee and officer of the bank at the time the acts took place. The plaintiff’s second amended petition alleged that the losses were covered under the terms of a bankers blanket bond and an excess bank employee dishonesty blanket bond issued to the plaintiff by the defendant, New Hampshire Insurance Company.
The defendant filed a motion to make the second amended petition more definite and certain and to strike…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Security Investment Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, a Corporation of the State of Maryland v. Hudson United Bank, a Banking Corporation of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coppi v. West American InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Wolff v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Southeast Bakery Feeds, Inc. v. Ranger InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. LEVINE & PARTNERS, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- First Security Savings v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.