Avesta AB v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Carman, Judge:
Plaintiffs seek review of the determination of the United States International Trade Commission (hereinafter Commission or ITC) not to institute an investigation under section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(b) (1982 & Supp. V 1987)) to determine whether an industry in the United States would be materially injured, threatened with material injury or whether the establishment of an industry in the United States would be materially retarded by reason of dumped imports of stainless steel plate from Sweden if the outstanding antidumping duty order on that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- American Permac, Inc. And Boewe Maschinenfabrik, Gmbh, Boewe Systems & MacHinery Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Avesta AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Avesta AB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Avesta Ab v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Nevinnomysskiy Azot v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007