Legal Opinion

Rose v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 20, 2000No. CA CR 00-227PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OHN Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

The appellants in this criminal case were charged with aggravated robbery and theft of property. After a jury trial, they were convicted of those offenses and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. From that decision, ■comes this appeal.

For reversal, appellants contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion for a directed verdict; in denying their motion to dismiss the charges against them on speedy-trial grounds; in granting the State’s motion in limine to bar testimony concerning the possible guilt of other persons; in rejecting as untimely appellants’…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. MacKintrush v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Marta v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Lam Luong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  3. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Ballard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API