Legal Opinion

Jochims v. Isuzu Motors, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided December 24, 1992No. 3-89-CV-70109PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE OR LIMIT THE TESTIMONY OF DR. NALECZ AND RENEWED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

BENNETT, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is the latest among many discovery disputes between the parties. The issue raised here is whether Plaintiff Jeffrey T. Jochims (“Jochims”) should be sanctioned by excluding or limiting the testimony of his principal liability expert, Dr. Andrezj Nalecz. Defendant Isuzu Motors, Ltd. (“Isuzu”) argues that Dr. Nalecz’s testimony should be excluded or limited because he has failed to produce documentation concerning the validation of his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Robert Geiserman v. John H. MacDonald A.B. & A.B. & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Gestetner Corp. v. Case Equipment Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1985
  5. Dicky D. Voegeli and Sharon Voegeli v. Harvard R. Lewis and Methodist Hospital, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
  2. Rouse v. Farmers State Bank of Jewell, IowaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hibbing Taconite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  4. Transamerica Life Insurance v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
  5. Transamerica Life Insurance v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API