Legal Opinion
United States v. Ringling
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 21, 2019No. 4:17-cv-04006Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 4:17-CV-04006-KES Plaintiff, vs. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DONNA RINGLING, SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOANN JANDREAU, KATHRYN STANDY, and KORY STANDY, Defendants. Plaintiff, the United States of America, moves for summary judgment against defendants, Donna Ringling, Joann Jandreau, Kathryn Standy, and Kory Standy under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Docket 43. Defendant Ringling opposed the motion. Docket 57. Defendants Jandreau, Kathryn Standy, and Kory Standy did not file any opposition.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.