Legal Opinion
Barron v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 2, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
(after stating the facts). The first assignment of error is that the court erred in giving instruction No. 10, which is as follows:
“You are instructed that the possession of the property recently stolen, without reasonable explanation of that possession, is evidence which goes to you for your consideration, under all the circumstances of the case, to be weighed as tending to show the guilt of one in whose hands such property is found, but such evidence alone does not imperatively impose upon you the duty of convicting, even though it is not rebutted. ’ ’
Counsel for the defendant relies upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shinn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Duckworth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Pearrow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Mooney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thiel v. DoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- French v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Atwood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Ham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Renfro v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950