Legal Opinion

Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2005No. 03AP-614PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pbtree, Judge.

{¶ 1} On September 10, 1999, plaintiff-appellant, David A. Jelinek, refiled a complaint in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas against Abbott Laboratories, Ross Products Division, Joy A. Amundson, Thomas M. McNally, William H. Stadtlander, Karl V. Insani, Gregory A. Lindberg, and James L. Sipes. The complaint set forth claims for relief of promissory estoppel, age discrimination in violation of R.C. 4112.02(A) and 4112.99, retaliation in violation of R.C. 4112.02(1) and 4112.99, violation of public policy, and spoliation of evidence.

{¶ 2} On July 31, 2000, the defendants…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Waddell v. Grant/Riverside Med. Care Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Smith v. Superior Prod., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Walter v. Adt Security Sys., 06ap-115 (6-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Jelinek v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Coryell v. Bank One Trust Co., N.A., 07ap-766 (6-5-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API