Legal Opinion

Pena v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1928No. 11265PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLattimore, J.

Conviction for assault to murder; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

We find in the record only one bill of exceptions, which was reserved to the refusal of a continuance. The bill is defective. The application for continuance does not appear therein. The bill is qualified by a statement of the trial court that the witness named in the application was present at the trial. The testimony in this ease is conflicting, the conflict arising over the question as to whether the shooting was done in self-defense or otherwise. The jury have settled this issue against appellant, and we do not…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edward Morgan MacKenna v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Edward Morgan MacKenna v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. MacKenna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Chavez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API