Legal Opinion

Chavez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1944No. 22839Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant, in his motion for a rehearing, claims that we erred in our original opinion in declining to consider his bill of exceptions relating to the court’s action in overruling his application for a continuance. The reason we did not discuss the matter sought to be brought forward by his bill of exceptions is that the bill is deficient. The application for a continuance is not incorporated in the bill nor referred to and made a part thereof. It merely recites that he presented his application for a continuance, sets out the evidence introduced to show…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Pena v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Lucera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API