United States v. Harvey C. Register
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
The revocation of Harvey C. Register’s probation was justified, we think, and on his appeal from the consequent commitment, we affirm.
Chiefly, the grievance asserted by the appellant is the acceptance of certain hearsay testimony by the District Court in regard to his breach of the probationary terms. In this there was no error or infringement of Register’s rights, and there was ample evidence without it to , sustain the revocation. However, as the trial judge is quite aware, there can be injury if hearsay plays too great a role in the inquiry, and he will constantly be alert to the frequent…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Thomas Worcester v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
- Rossi v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.