Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 27, 1968PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice.

The determinative question in this appeal is whether a revocation of probation and imposition of a prison sentence, when based upon hearsay evidence alone, constitutes abuse of discretion. We think so.

I

In 1964, the defendant entered pleas of guilty to two charges of abortion. She was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of five years on each charge, but the execution of the sentences was suspended and she was placed upon probation for a period of ten years.

In 1967, the defendant was indicted on a charge of committing an abortion on March 20, 1967, to which charge she entered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Brill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kurzmann v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API