Legal Opinion

JODI DANIELLE MARTIN, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 2019No. SD35498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JODI DANIELLE MARTIN, ) ) Movant-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SD35498 ) STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Filed: Feb. 21, 2019 ) Respondent-Respondent. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOLLINGER COUNTY Honorable Benjamin F. Lewis AFFIRMED Jodi Danielle Martin (“Movant”) appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief. In two points on appeal, Movant claims the trial court clearly erred in denying relief without holding an evidentiary hearing because: (1) “she alleged facts, not conclusions, which if proven,” would establish that there was no factual…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniell W. Bibbs v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. TERRENCE TYRELL TINSLEY, JR. v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. TIMOTHY EASLEY, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API